![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
==== I like his current immigration stance.
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
Dunno but it's time for a little housecleaning...
Galaxy, You seem to be stumping pretty heavily for Huckabee here. In fact, you only seem to appear at election time. Fine. Stick to one thread (this one) if you want preach the Gospel according to Huckabee. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
Anybody remember the December '03 cover of National Review that featured Howard Dean in full flight of his insanity, face contorted and gesticulating wildly? The caption was 'PLEASE nominate this man.' The hook was, of course, National Review is CONSERVATIVE, and wanted ANY Republican to win the election, so they were cheering the 'easy kill' Democrat, which was Dean.
And so it is with Huckabee: he'd see the end of the conservative movement in America. He'd have the most negative coat-tail effect in the history of American presidential politics. He'd get shellacked in fifty states, and he'd destroy the concept of the Reagan Democrat, absolutely guaranteeing that the GOP would wander the electoral wilderness for the next forty years. He's marginally better than that lunatic Ron Paul, and that's literally the best thing I can think to say about him. If EITHER of these two are the GOP nominee, I'm writing in Newt Gingrich. They are - and this is almost too hard to type - WORSE than anybody that has a shot at the Democratic nomination. Huckabee is OUR 'easy kill' guy for the Democrats. You want a Hillary or Obama (or a Hillary AND Obama) landslide? Huck's the guy for YOU! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Only smart thing the Dems've done in 4 years is put the ball gag in Dean's mouth. -dale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
Quote:
I miss him. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Foreign Service
Moderator Lei Feng Protege |
bluesman,
i dislike huckabee too- the guy is schizo in his economic policy and a bible-thumper everywhere else- but given the number of social conservatives out there these days, would huck's candidacy really send the republicans to political wilderness that long? how do you figure?
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present. -Marcus Aurelius, Meditations |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|