ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > 2008 US Presidential Election
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-15-2008, 23:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
FarSide
Banished
 
Join Date: 10-27-07
Posts: 58
Huckabee

Huckabee vows to defy birthright citizenship*-*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

The Raw Story | Huckabee: Amend Constitution to be in 'God's standards'
I don't know about this source but the video is legit.

Is there anyone out there who wants this nutjob to win? I'd love to hear from you because this is just outrageous.
FarSide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 00:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,274
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
Huckabee vows to defy birthright citizenship*-*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

The Raw Story | Huckabee: Amend Constitution to be in 'God's standards'
I don't know about this source but the video is legit.

Is there anyone out there who wants this nutjob to win? I'd love to hear from you because this is just outrageous.
I think he has something there.

Better he than any of the democrats. Talk about nutjobs, have you heard any of the democrats lately?
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 00:08 AM   #3 (permalink)
FarSide
Banished
 
Join Date: 10-27-07
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
I think he has something there.

Better he than any of the democrats. Talk about nutjobs, have you heard any of the democrats lately?
Where?

I'm all for cracking down on illegal immigration but cutting up the 14 amendment is no way to do it.

As for the last one, no. Just, no.
FarSide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 00:41 AM   #4 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,274
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
Where?

I'm all for cracking down on illegal immigration but cutting up the 14 amendment is no way to do it.

As for the last one, no. Just, no.
Why not?

What was 14th Amendment for? Why is it that someone gets automatic citizenship just because he's born here?

I think the 14th should be amended so that newborns are granted similar residency status as their parents.

For example: children of permanant residents automatically get green cards; children of citizens are citizens; children of people on work or student visa get terperary residency contingent upong their parents; and of course, no papers, no status.

I don't hate illegal immigrants. I just think they are very disrespectiful of those who followed the rules and jump the hoops in order to get in.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 00:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
FarSide
Banished
 
Join Date: 10-27-07
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Why not?

What was 14th Amendment for? Why is it that someone gets automatic citizenship just because he's born here?

I think the 14th should be amended so that newborns are granted similar residency status as their parents.

For example: children of permanant residents automatically get green cards; children of citizens are citizens; children of people on work or student visa get terperary residency contingent upong their parents; and of course, no papers, no status.

I don't hate illegal immigrants. I just think they are very disrespectiful of those who followed the rules and jump the hoops in order to get in.

From now on when I refer to the 14th amendment I'm just referring to the citizenship part, not the rest. Anyone who wants to totally get rid of it is a massive screwball.


The problem is that we don't know the status of the parents. What if one is illegal and one is legal? Why does the child suffer because of the parents' misdeeds? The 14th amendment made it so that we would not abridge anyone's citizenship on any account, as long as they were born here. You also cant force the parents to prove they are citizens before the hospital admits them, that'd be kind of cruel. What about the babies? Their parents sure didn't have the requisite papers so they never would, would they never be allowed to be citizens?

You live here you should have to pay taxes and have the chance to participate in the political process as you please. Legals pay taxes and are overall better than making them illegal.

I'm for tighter restrictions on illegals, but this is not the way. Make immigration easer and illegal immigration harder.
FarSide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 00:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,406
Country:
The 14th is hollow anyway thanks to Roe V Wade, the Patriot Act, the gun control act of 1968 and several other laws that effectively gutted the constitution under the pretense of the necessary and proper clause.

The Plus side- At least tying a child's citizenship to that of its parents would save us money. Thousands of women wait just across the border until ready to give birth. Right now if thier child is born here they get medical, housing, food, a little bit of cash and a free ride.

The negative- The only reason I oppose such a move is if birth is not sacred nothing defining citizenship is and thus we lose what personal sovereignty we have left.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 01:13 AM   #7 (permalink)
donnie
Contributor
 
donnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-03
Location: pa usa
Posts: 519
A child born of illegal immigrants who are Mexican citizens, and subject to Mexican authority and who have rights as Mexicans citizens through treaties with the US, are in fact subjects to the juridiction of Mexico, not the US.

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States..."
__________________
Whoever is unjust let him be unjust still
Whoever is righteous let him be righteous still
Whoever is filthy let him be filthy still
Listen to the words long written down
When the man comes around- Jhonny Cash
donnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 01:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,274
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post

From now on when I refer to the 14th amendment I'm just referring to the citizenship part, not the rest. Anyone who wants to totally get rid of it is a massive screwball.
Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
The problem is that we don't know the status of the parents. What if one is illegal and one is legal?
We'll take the one closest to a full citizen. If a parent is illegal and the other a citizen, the child will be a citizen. If a parent is permanant resident and the other is on student visa, the child will have permant residency. Would that work?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
Why does the child suffer because of the parents' misdeeds?
The child will not suffer. He would otherwise be born in a country his parents had given up on anyways. Unless you're suggesting the parents came here illegally so they can suffer even more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
The 14th amendment made it so that we would not abridge anyone's citizenship on any account, as long as they were born here.
Again, what was the 14th Amendment for?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
You also cant force the parents to prove they are citizens before the hospital admits them, that'd be kind of cruel.
They don't have to prove they're citizens. They just have to provide enough money or insurance. No papers, no citizenship.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
What about the babies? Their parents sure didn't have the requisite papers so they never would, would they never be allowed to be citizens?
Maybe their parents should have thought of that to begin with. They can go back to their country of origin and hope that government could offer something for their people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
You live here you should have to pay taxes and have the chance to participate in the political process as you please. Legals pay taxes and are overall better than making them illegal.
It's not about taxes or social services. I'm against social welfare even for citizens. It's about how these illegals get in front of the line of people who actually followed the rules and jumped through the hoops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarSide View Post
I'm for tighter restrictions on illegals, but this is not the way. Make immigration easer and illegal immigration harder.
I agree. And one way to make illegal immigration is to take away the incentive of birthright citizen ship.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 10:27 AM   #9 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by donnie View Post
A child born of illegal immigrants who are Mexican citizens, and subject to Mexican authority and who have rights as Mexicans citizens through treaties with the US, are in fact subjects to the juridiction of Mexico, not the US.

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States..."
I'm not a Constitutional lawyer, but I don't think that is what that clause means.

A Mexican national living in the US is not subject to Mexican jurisdiction unless he is returned to Mexico for whatever reason.

An American who moves to another country and surrenders his US citizenship in the process is no longer a US citizen, even though he may have been born in the US. He is no longer "subject to the jurisdiction of the US". (not all countries recognize dual-citizenship)
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 20:31 PM   #10 (permalink)
donnie
Contributor
 
donnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-03
Location: pa usa
Posts: 519
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
I'm not a Constitutional lawyer, but I don't think that is what that clause means.
Well there are Constitutional lawyers who would disagree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
A Mexican national living in the US is not subject to Mexican jurisdiction unless he is returned to Mexico for whatever reason.
completely untrue, we have several treaties that contradict that statement, and Mexico has several laws that also contradict that statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
An American who moves to another country and surrenders his US citizenship
well there's the rub

Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
in the process is no longer a US citizen, even though he may have been born in the US. He is no longer "subject to the jurisdiction of the US". (not all countries recognize dual-citizenship)
Your talking about someone who has surrendered their citizenship, completely different then someone just living here illegally without renouncing their own citizenship wouldn’t you say? If I were to say go to Europe and over stay my visa, are you saying that I am no longer "subject to the jurisdiction of the US" on the contrary I would be entitled to every right afforded me under any treaty that government had with the US.

An illegal Mexican (I pick Mexican because I know we have citizen treaties with them) has certain rights as a Mexican citizen. Mexico does not allow dual citizenship, so there are Mexican citizens who are protected by certain treaties with Mexico, like for instance prison transfer treaties, or automatic appeals for all death row inmates.

although one could argue the meaning of the clause, you were comparing apples and oranges.

all this relates to naturalized citizens, what i was trying to say orginaly is to declare that all people are born citizens of thier parents countries, then that person being born would fall under the "subject to the jurisdiction of the US" clause, because? because we say so?

Last edited by donnie : 01-16-2008 at 22:10 PM.
donnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 22:23 PM   #11 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,390
Country:
Huckabee: Change Constitution, For God’s Sake


Sen. Mike Huckabee told The Jewish Week his comments about God and the Constitution were about the human life amendment. “I am not suggesting that we rewrite the Constitution,” he said. Getty Images



by James D. Besser/Washington
Some Jewish leaders are scratching their heads — and Jewish Democrats are gloating — over the latest religious pronouncement from former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, the ordained Baptist minister who has skyrocketed to the top tier in the race for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.
Speaking Monday at a campaign rally in Warren, Mich., Huckabee said he wants to change the Constitution to be consistent with God’s word.
“I have opponents in this race who do not want to change the Constitution,” he told cheering supporters. “But I believe it’s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God. And that’s what we need to do, to amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards
rather than try to change God’s standards so it lines up with some contemporary view of how we treat each other and how we treat the family.”
In a statement to The Jewish Week, Huckabee had this to say about the controversy.
“Earlier this week, I was speaking about the human life amendment which I support and has been a part of the Republican platform since 1980 — and traditional marriage. I am not suggesting that we rewrite the Constitution.
“However, I do believe I am the authentic conservative in the race, having pushed for pro-life, pro-family measures my entire public life — in fact, those are the issues that define me and led me to get active in politics.”
Huckabee’s comments were “unreal,” said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, a group that has taken the lead in urging politicians in both parties to stop mixing religion and politics. I’m flabbergasted he doesn’t have the sensitivity to see how this will be offensive to many Americans. Who gets to determine which are ‘Godly’ values? Which Bible?”
Foxman said Huckabee did not take such a sectarian approach when he was governor of Arkansas. “So why is it coming up now?”

Part of the answer: the increasingly complex battle for the GOP presidential nomination. Huckabee, some analysts said, badly needs a victory in the Jan. 19 South Carolinia primary, where Evangelicals will play a critical role.
Over the weekend the candidate gave two sermons from the pulpit of a Spartanburg church.
Foxman said that in a campaign in which Democrats and Republicans alike are raising matters of faith as never before, Huckabee “keeps pushing the envelope further and further. This conviction that he alone possesses the truth is disturbing in someone who wants to be the leader of all the American people.”
The Jewish Week News
Back to top
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 22:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,991
Country:
Farside, please use more courtesy in your selection of thread titles.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 23:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
jame$thegreat
Senior Contributor
 
jame$thegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,125
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Better he than any of the democrats.
This.
__________________
Sometimes things dont end up how they should, a son, a brother, a mentor, a teacher, a cousin, a nephew, a grandson and a god in my eyes.

Who knows what he more could have been...

Christopher Muzykant

April 9, 1976-November 4,2005

My Brother, Always and forever
jame$thegreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 23:14 PM   #14 (permalink)
TheGreenSmoke
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-16-05
Posts: 114
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Why not?

What was 14th Amendment for? Why is it that someone gets automatic citizenship just because he's born here?

I think the 14th should be amended so that newborns are granted similar residency status as their parents.

For example: children of permanant residents automatically get green cards; children of citizens are citizens; children of people on work or student visa get terperary residency contingent upong their parents; and of course, no papers, no status.

I don't hate illegal immigrants. I just think they are very disrespectiful of those who followed the rules and jump the hoops in order to get in.
My parents had me in the US while they were here on their visas so I can have a better life as an American citizen. I love my country; I even missed one semester of college so I can enlist in the army reserves. My peers ridicule me for my decision, but I know they don't know any better.

I am an American.
TheGreenSmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 23:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,526
Country:
huckabee should go back to the pulpit where he belongs. what the hell is this, bringing the constitution in line with god's words???
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present.

-Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
astralis is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Huckabee Signs “No Amnesty” Pledge in SC troung 2008 US Presidential Election 6 01-23-2008 10:12 AM
Huckabee unapologetic for religious tone Ironduke 2008 US Presidential Election 4 12-24-2007 16:15 PM
Huckabee wanted to isolate AIDS patients troung 2008 US Presidential Election 48 12-14-2007 17:57 PM
Huckabee adds Ric Flair to fold troung 2008 US Presidential Election 15 12-06-2007 21:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:30 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8