![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
I really don't want to see Rudy win otherwise he will ruin the Republican agenda when he becomes President. He's blatantly anti-gun rights and pro-gun control, pro-choice, and on some of the issues, he is right in the democrat camp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Underwater panelbeater
Military Professional
|
What a complicated electrol system you have.
In Australia, if an election campaign is longer than 8 weeks, it is considered to be a long campaign. The term of Government is 3 years but at any time the Prime Minister can call an election. To do so he/she must go to the Governor General and have writs issued to dissolve both houses of Parliament. Then the Prime Minister declares the date for the election. Then for the next 6 to 8 weeks, they go at it hard, pressing the flesh, kissing babies, etc. On election day, and it's always a Saturday, voting in compulsory, yes that's right, compulsory. If you don't vote you get a fine of $20.00. I believe it is a good system, making people vote. That way you get a better turnout of voters making the winner having a majority of eligible votes. We don't have a "first past the post" system, we have a preferential system where the person who you want to govern, you vote 1, the next 2, and so on to the person you want least to govern. Then preferences are distributed, EG: people who are voted 2 give preferences to other parties. When it's a general election, it's for the "upper house" House of representatives, and either a full or half senate election for the "lower house". Any bill that is passed in the "upper house"must be passed in the lower house to become law. If it doesn't pass in the lower house it either goes back to the upper house for changing or is dropped. If a bill is rejected by the lower house three times, the Prime Minister can call a "double disillusion" and call a general election as was done in 1974. By about now you're very confused, but it works very well. We don't have politicians in your face 24/7 for 18 months, 6 weeks is long enough. And just for the record, I hope Hillary gets in. Freddie
__________________
I'm the Happiness Fairy. I've sprinkled happy dust on you. So Smile dammit. This sh1t's expensive. Bulla Fiax concouria quantium vis |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
This thread reminds me of a few discussions with Obama supporters. No one is quite sure what policy is at stake, but they "like him". No one knows why they like him, but they do.
Romney "looks Presidential" and has a cute wife. Agreed. What about his policy? If this is all about sex appeal, I say the GOP should run Michelle Malkin. I would feel a lot better about Romney if someone could say to me: "his proposed solution to [problem x] is to [do something] which is a good idea because [support based in fact]" |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Sometimes the other candidates are so unlikable and their policies are such that we won't support them that we end up voting for candidates who are "likable" and doesn't really have policies. It goes to show how polarized the US society has become.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Ah, the life of a subversive.............. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |||
|
Burgomaster
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The Buck Stops Here |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
-dale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
I was being 'toungue in cheek', but, seriously, a lot of voters are not too concerned about policies. Many people go for image alone. If Arnie Schwarznegger ran for the presidency (and the law was changed to allow this) he would stand a pretty good chance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
Vote at your own Peril
As far as what Romney makes speaches about and what his past record shows as facts. He is probably the closest thing to truism a canidate could be and still say he is for conservetism along a so called "Republican" ticket.
I've only voted once in my life and that was for Reagan. No I'm not a fanatic either. I can't stand career politicians. And won't vote for them period. You got the royal clinton family. You got the royal Bush family. It makes me sick. Lets just have a king and queen for life. Ha, ha. If Fred can't make it work. It would be sad. I would spend time on pondering to go ahead and vote for Romney as my concession otherwise it's another no vote boycott. Niether party is held acountable to nothing after they get in anyway's. It's a machine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
I have a suggestion: America should become a monarchy, with the Queen of England as its monarch, and join the British Commonwealth. Then you could simply elect a political party into power (instead of a president) and the party will elect a leader and Prime Minister. This will strengthen the special relationship with the UK and make the world a safer place. Also, this could make it easy for Canada to join the US and leave the French speakers of Quebec to form their own little state.
Last edited by marklv : 01-16-2008 at 20:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
|
Church and State still separated??
Quote:
![]()
__________________
SCUL |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Romney wins Wyoming | Ironduke | 2008 US Presidential Election | 4 | 01-20-2008 15:11 PM |
| Clinton Defends Michigan Ballot Stand | Shamus | 2008 US Presidential Election | 3 | 10-11-2007 18:50 PM |
| NAWER 1974 introduction | NAWER1974 | Member Introductions | 13 | 10-04-2007 11:44 AM |
| Bin Laden is back!!! | FullTank | Current Affairs | 42 | 09-11-2007 08:40 AM |
| Still a liberal? Paradise beckons... | Bluesman | Political Discussions | 9 | 09-24-2006 22:30 PM |