ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > 2008 US Presidential Election
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-05-2008, 22:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,991
Country:
Justice William J. Clinton?

Quote:
If Clinton wins, would Justice Clinton be far behind?

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- It is a title that would be sure to bring either fear or cheer to many Americans, depending on your political leanings: Supreme Court Justice Bill Clinton.

That provocative possibility has long been whispered in legal and political circles ever since Sen. Hillary Clinton became a viable candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Now a respected conservative law professor has openly predicted a future President Clinton would name her husband to the high court if a vacancy occurred.

Pepperdine Law School's Douglas Kmiec wrote recently in the Wall Street Journal, "The former president would be intrigued by court service and many would cheer him on."

Kmiec worked for Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush in the White House as a top lawyer, but said he has no personal or political "disdain" for Bill Clinton.

CNN talked with several political and legal analysts of both ideological stripes, and while several laughed at the possibility, none would rule it out completely. And all those who spoke, did so on background only.

There certainly would be no legal barriers to such an appointment. Under federal anti-nepotism laws a President Clinton would be barred from naming her husband, or any relative to an Executive Branch position that required Senate confirmation. But the judiciary, as a separate branch, would present no such problems.

There is precedent for such a nomination: William Howard Taft, who called his time as chief justice, from 1921 to 1930, the most rewarding of his career. He was president from 1909 to 1913.

As one Democratic political analyst said, "You may recall recent trial balloons that Mr. Clinton was perhaps interested in becoming U.N. secretary-general. If he is grasping for a similarly large stage to fill his ambitions and ego, what better place than the nation's highest court, where could serve for life if he wanted?"

But a conservative lawyer who argues regularly before the high court noted Chief Justice John Roberts is fully entrenched in his position, and that might be the only high court spot Clinton would want.

He also might not enjoy the relative self-imposed anonymity the justices rely on to do their jobs free of political and public pressures, the lawyer said.

"Court arguments are not televised, and most justices shy away from publicity as a matter of respect for the court's integrity," the lawyer said. "Could Justice Clinton follow their example?"
Read more here: If Clinton wins, would Justice Clinton be far behind? - CNN.com
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 22:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,884
Country:
Um. No. NO. Please Lord, no.
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 22:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,884
Country:
Wow. I'd considered voting for Clinton if the wrong Republican got in, just for fun. But even the thought of such a horror makes me shudder. Ugh.
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 23:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
There goes the Seperation of Powers doctrine in the US Constitution! Just what we needed....
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 01:07 AM   #5 (permalink)
Blademaster
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,277
[Donnie Brascoe mode on] Fooorget abaaouuut it. [Donnie Brascoe mode off]

The Democrats do not have enough votes to override a filibuster by the Republicans. In the next election, at most, the Democrats will get a 53 vote majority.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 01:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Well. What a thought. He can't even practice law, after being disbarred for felony perjury, and he's a possible Supreme.

If that doesn't tell us everything we all need to know about which party should never, ever be allowed into the Oval Office ever again, what else could possibly convince us?
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 02:36 AM   #7 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
But we must not forget he was a great President...If only he could run again.
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 02:45 AM   #8 (permalink)
Bigfella
Senior Contributor
 
Bigfella's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 949
Country:
Hmmmm, Pepperdine....Pepperdine....where have I heard that name before? Oh, that's right, wasn't Kenneth Starr 'Chamber' employed by Pepperdine? Sounds like the GOP is getting their money's worth there.
Bigfella is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 23:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,274
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
But we must not forget he was a great President...If only he could run again.
Lucky...maybe. Great? Absolutely not.

The only reason I would want Billy in office for a 3rd straight term is so that 9-11 happens under his watch and democrats would shut up about the government conspiracy.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 00:14 AM   #10 (permalink)
texasjohn
Senior Contributor
 
texasjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 1,048
Country:
"Justice Clinton" would probably legalize pot!!
texasjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 00:23 AM   #11 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Posts: 9,937
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
He also might not enjoy the relative self-imposed anonymity the justices rely on to do their jobs free of political and public pressures, the lawyer said.

"Court arguments are not televised, and most justices shy away from publicity as a matter of respect for the court's integrity," the lawyer said. "Could Justice Clinton follow their example?"
Bill Clinton? Toil away from the spotlight?

I'll say it too: Fugeddaboudit
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 00:55 AM   #12 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,766
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
But we must not forget he was a great President...If only he could run again.
List five things he did or accomplished that made him a "great President" please. Then we'll discuss.

I actually DO think he'd make a great Sec Gen of the UN though. It's the job he was made for, and I honestly do think he'd be as good for America and the world as that silly and useless position allows for. I would support him for that without any reservations I could think of.

-dale

Last edited by dalem : 01-07-2008 at 00:58 AM.
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 01:27 AM   #13 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
List five things he did or accomplished that made him a "great President" please. Then we'll discuss.

I actually DO think he'd make a great Sec Gen of the UN though. It's the job he was made for, and I honestly do think he'd be as good for America and the world as that silly and useless position allows for. I would support him for that without any reservations I could think of.

-dale
You are truly a brilliant person. After your absolutely perfect suggestion, I, too, believe that Bill and the UN should serve the full term of punishment in close confinement with each other.

US Ambassador to the UN...YEAH, baby!!!
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 14:30 PM   #14 (permalink)
Julie
Moderator
 
Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 6,806
Country:
Oh Gawd yall....Bill Clinton is the least of our worries.....Feb. 5 Obama will win the Democratic nomination, and the House and Senate will be comparable to a McDonald's drive-thru passing liberal legislation......Arrrrggg....I feel sick.
Julie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 23:32 PM   #15 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,274
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julie View Post
Oh Gawd yall....Bill Clinton is the least of our worries.....Feb. 5 Obama will win the Democratic nomination, and the House and Senate will be comparable to a McDonald's drive-thru passing liberal legislation......Arrrrggg....I feel sick.
That's only provided Obama wins the presidency. He has 2 hurdles to cross: 1. win in states other than Iowa and NH; 2. win the presidency.

Should he get the nomination, that just might unify the republican party to get someone, anyone, to the white house.

The prospect of Al Gore in the white house was a major reason why Bush won.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clinton and Iraq war Major_Armstrong Political Discussions 11 09-26-2008 04:46 AM
Clinton Library Got Funds From Saudis Kansas Bear Current Affairs 11 12-17-2007 01:46 AM
WHO is sending this much cash to Democrats, and what do they hope to buy with it? Bluesman 2008 US Presidential Election 184 10-26-2007 12:47 PM
Mystic Fire Burned Philippine Supreme Court, 3 Deaths judgefloro World Affairs Board Pub 22 01-21-2007 08:52 AM
Clinton vs. McCain Julie Political Discussions 30 03-15-2006 18:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8