tw-acs

As much as I will listen to others views, you should listen to mine.

I agree we must figure out why the US and UK officials acted the way they did. And what reasons they made the choices they did. That is exaclty what I am trying to do. I am focusing on US officials.1

I think that taking the approach that is most readily allowed for by what information is presented to us from the media ( owned by corporations) is not the best approach. I think that the administration is in office for purely personal gain. I do not think they have America nor Americans at heart when they make choices like they have.

I think that me mentioning Cannabis Sativa and hemp in an arguement against the actions taken by the president will get my posts discredited by persons that are too ignorant to read them. I am not saying anyone is just that a controversial issue like that will do that.

Though logically HEMP could help mankind and the earth immensly. Oh and it might hurt established industries( Corporations). Which is why it is illegal today. A process for making paper with wood pulp was successful. The persons that owned this paper making process saw that hemp could make better paper more efficeintely thus very harmful for wood pulp paper.

This man also owned a Newspaper and started calling cannabis sativa/hemp by its spanish name, Marijuana. And playing with mexican racism to get farmers confused. See the farmers did not realize Marijuana was hemp. Thus allowed for the Marijuana tax act of 1937 to be passed.

You are probably dont have a clue why I even bring up hemp in this forum. If you have no clue that is exactly why i do it.

Hemp should be industrialized for many reasons. I.E reducing US dependency on foriegn petroleum. Thus lowering tension in areas with high volumes of petroleum. I.E Middle East

In a democracy or some form of it, the type of government we have in th USA, citizens have all the power.

If it is not difficult to find persons that agree its is even more difficult organizing them to get proper response from officials.

I hope, this is my personal opinion that Bush is not re-elected and that we can have persons in the White house that are not going to throw one over on us. That will have the American at mind every second of every term served and even after.

I am not saying for fact that they did. Just about 99.9% sure that George Bush and Friends and the USA's most dangerous fiends. (Corporations, ironically, they provide the USA with a lot of wealth by exploiting Americans labor. Soon we will not even get the oppurtunity to be exploited ( having a job) because they will be in foriegn countries.

Not that they intend to attack America but exploit it as much as possible. Even to the extent of telling the American worker your fired cause you want too much money. Then they send that labor to a forigen country with very lax standards for working conditions and wage rate.

Exporting jobs is not good for America. Especially during war time. Not the war in Iraq though equally notable. The war on terrorism.

What happens to the USA IF Bush allows for the exporting of jobs. Where will we work? We would lose are manufacturing base and thus in war time we would rely on foriegn nations for manufacturing. I am not the most brilliant strategist but I do know this is not a good strategy.

The only postive I can see from exporting jobs is that corporations will make labor cost less. And allow for more profits. Those profits generally go into the already deeply lined pockets of the Corporate Executives.

And if you look at the policy changes the Bush Administration has made for example healthcare. You see that Corporations are benefitting from every action Bush has made in office.

Bourgeoisies

All the actions of the Bush Administration seem to benefit corporations more than any other entity.

Presumably the Bush Administration has one goal. To make as much money as possible like the capitalist should.

It is clearly explained in the New American Century. American Imperialism.

To summarize all this, Bush is a figurehead, in office for the benefit of Corporations and the further exploitation of Labor.

Centralization of wealth.

To think that wealth is centralized now, is almost amusing when you think about what may be in store for the world if the USA does not get a president with American Ideals in mind.