Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Defcon 6
Gee I wonder if this article might be biased!!!  |
Factual information in it is not.
Quote:
|
Yes, it is mad crazy amazing.
|
Is that supposed to be the extent of your argument?
Quote:
|
It actually isn't all that costly.
|
Actually, yes it is, if it wasn't you guys wouldn't be trying to develop a less expensive JSF. Just read, its not hard. Also i am gonna trust the American Senate on what they consider expensive and what not over what you think, no hurt feelings i hope.
Quote:
|
Enemy that no longer exists? Will excuse me, evidently the world outside the U.S has stopped using fighter planes!
|
The kind of enemy you are fighting now does not use airpower, yes USSR no longer exists, thus there is no threat of war with it, the only nations that are hostile towards you do not use air power on any massive scale.
Quote:
|
Gee, maybe we'll be the non existant Su-47 instead
|
Su-47 exists, i don't get your point.
denial, one thing yanks on this board are good at.
Quote:
|
OH RIGHT! LOL. And some russian military site managed to get their hands on this type of black project data! what a load of b.s
|
Eh.....what black project data? They show this stuff on C-SPAN.
Quote:
|
Evidently the journalist can't even name the most recent processor called the pentium 4, nor does he know what software and avionics are running the F-22.
|
The article was written before pentium for came out. Also once again i am going to go with US senate to know more about F-22 avionics then you.
Quote:
|
rhetoric. this was the best part of the article. what a joke. Evidently this new Russian Radar is so groundbreaking that the laws of physics cease to exist in its combat radius.
|
Evidiently you do not know the laws of physics.
Quote:
|
Really? Thats not what we've seen so far in Baghdad and other such places. Pretty unbeatable vs. ground threats.
|
Iraq didn't have ground threats.
Quote:
|
It's a no show. The F-22 can track, lock and shoot down 7 targets simultaneously. The Su's would get annihilated.
|
Right, and the fact taht there is nothing to support this is okay with you.
Quote:
|
ooh boy. this obviously isn't bias. The Mig 1.42 that doesn't exist.
|
It exists once again, but Russian next step is PAK-FA.
Is this the best you can do? 100% BS comments and zero factual content? Why are where so many 12 year old yanks in denial on these boards? Is where a sign some there that atracts them?