View Single Post
Old 12-17-2005, 23:33 PM   #8 (permalink)
Bulgaroctonus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-29-04
Location: Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 1,139
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by shek
What is your theory then on why the NYT decided to put the story that they had in their hands for a year to print yesterday?
I didn't find any evidence that the NYT had this story for a year. Honestly, I may have just overlooked it, can you show the evidence to me?

Quote:
Originally Posted by shek
The other feasible alternatives are to try and influence the Patriot Act vote or to shamelessly promote the journalist's book that is being published two weeks from now. Conspiracies abound
So which of the following NYT reporters for these stories has a book coming out in two weeks?
JAMES RISEN
ERIC LICHTBLAU
DAVID E. SANGER
BARCLAY WALSH

Quote:
Originally Posted by shek
In any case, I look forward to seeing the leakers in both this case and the secret prison case being prosecuted for breaking the law.
I wouldn't be to worried about that, Robert Novak got off scott free. The penalites for leaking just don't seem to be what they used to be.
Bulgaroctonus is offline   Reply With Quote